183
183
Nov 29, 2012
11/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 183
favorite 0
quote 0
it wasn't the fbi, it was us, the cia who changed the talking points. there is still a question about who specifically did it. has any light been shed on that? >> they are doing internal review of that and putting together a time line exactly who looked at the talking points and made that change to kind of reveal that information. but really the question is who gave those talking points to ambassador rice, who did direct the entire effort of changing the narrative. in the end i think what this is all about is this president and this administration -- somebody running for reelection didn't want the narrative that we killed bin laden and al qaeda was decimated. because al qaeda isn't decimated. it's on the rise and threatening america. megyn: they say we weren't entirely sure that it was al qaeda. and there was no reason to throw that name out there that early in the ballgame, and we were still investigating and may have had security reasons for not revealing all we knew. >> there were no issues in terms of revealing intelligence sources or methods by tal
it wasn't the fbi, it was us, the cia who changed the talking points. there is still a question about who specifically did it. has any light been shed on that? >> they are doing internal review of that and putting together a time line exactly who looked at the talking points and made that change to kind of reveal that information. but really the question is who gave those talking points to ambassador rice, who did direct the entire effort of changing the narrative. in the end i think what...
155
155
Nov 2, 2012
11/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 155
favorite 0
quote 0
the cia releasing a time line its actions. suggesting it played a bigger part in trying to fend off the attackers and save the besieged americans than had previously been reported. our report last friday was several contractors in an agency annex had between denied help during the fighting. catherine herridge is live in washington with more. >> reporter: a senior u.s. intelligence official tells fox there was no second guessing on the night of the attack adding there were no orders to anyone to stand down. u.s. intelligence officials providing the detailed time line of the attack and what they say is the agency's response. the first call for help came into the annex which we know is a cia outpost. the attack happened shortly after 9:35 and there was no demonstration at the time. 25 minutes later a cia security team left the annex for the consulate. by 10:40 the cia is inside the consulate searching the safe room for ambassador stevens. all u.s. personnel except for the missing u.s. ambassador are pulled from the mission. a rev
the cia releasing a time line its actions. suggesting it played a bigger part in trying to fend off the attackers and save the besieged americans than had previously been reported. our report last friday was several contractors in an agency annex had between denied help during the fighting. catherine herridge is live in washington with more. >> reporter: a senior u.s. intelligence official tells fox there was no second guessing on the night of the attack adding there were no orders to...
167
167
Nov 30, 2012
11/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 167
favorite 0
quote 0
if we don't put the cia operatives on the ground who will supervise where our arms wind up? >> if we have no grown up western supervision on the ground i wouldn't send a single bullet into syria. it will be funneled by the turks to the islamists. and this is tragic because the inaction while not as bad as clinton's inaction on rwanda. the inaction has empowered our enemies, the people in the middle east. at some time you have got to take a stand. nobody was asking among the syrian freedom fighters. nobody wanted u.s. troops on the ground. they wanted minimal arms to defend themselves and we outsourced our foreign policy to fundamentalist regimes and they supported the fundamentalists. there is one other issue. the nato air defense patriot batteries going to turkey to defend turkish air space and send a message to assad. that an inside baseball nato issue. and i wouldn't confuse that with giving arms to the syrian rebels. megyn: is there any way of establishing a safe haven any want the viewers to know syria seems so far away it seems like there is a bad guy running it and fo
if we don't put the cia operatives on the ground who will supervise where our arms wind up? >> if we have no grown up western supervision on the ground i wouldn't send a single bullet into syria. it will be funneled by the turks to the islamists. and this is tragic because the inaction while not as bad as clinton's inaction on rwanda. the inaction has empowered our enemies, the people in the middle east. at some time you have got to take a stand. nobody was asking among the syrian freedom...
175
175
Nov 1, 2012
11/12
by
FOXNEWS
tv
eye 175
favorite 0
quote 0
what there was confusion about inside the intelligence community and state department, cia, everybody, was what exactly happened. it took two weeks for the intelligence consensus to settle down which is pretty quick as far as these things go. and so we now know what happened. there was clearly confusing stories. >> there seems to have been confusion in the intelligence communities. and the state department, i don't know. the state department says that stuff about the video didn't come from us. that was not our conclusion. they watched it unfold realtime and realtime apparently concluded this was an act of terror. there are still so 15-minute questions. >> that's what the president said the day after it happened. megyn: even though he used that term, he declined specifically repeatedly to confirm in the affirmative when he was asked was this terrorism. he kept saying we have to let the facts play out. you can't say by using the term "terrorism questions was saying it was an act of terrorism. you understand why people are confused, right? >> two weeks later at the u.n. he did not mentio
what there was confusion about inside the intelligence community and state department, cia, everybody, was what exactly happened. it took two weeks for the intelligence consensus to settle down which is pretty quick as far as these things go. and so we now know what happened. there was clearly confusing stories. >> there seems to have been confusion in the intelligence communities. and the state department, i don't know. the state department says that stuff about the video didn't come...